Vocabulary
This defined vocabulary aims at providing all essential terms to describe datasets of functional trait measurements and facts for ecological research.
The list of terms is ordered into a core section with essential columns for trait data, extensions which are allowing to provide additional layers of information, as well as a vocabulary for metadata information of particular importance for trait data. Another section provides defined terms for trait definitions to be included in the metadata or published along with the dataset.
We provide four extensions of the vocabulary, that allow for additional information on the trait measurement.
- the
Taxon
extension provides further terms for specifying the taxonomic resolution of the observation.
- the
Occurrence
extension contains information on the level of individual specimens, such as date and location, or method of sampling and preservation, or physiological specifications of the phenotype, such as sex, life stage or age.
- the
MeasurementOrFact
extension contains information at the level of single measurements or reported values, such as the original literature from where the value is cited, the method of measurement or statistical method used for aggregation.
- The
BiodiversityExploratories
extension provides columns for linking trait data from the Biodiversity Exploratories project to the respective plots and regions (www.biodiversity-exploratories.de).
This glossary of terms is available as
- this human-readable reference (html website), including commentaries and further definitions,
- a csv table file (the ‘source’ file, ETS.csv),
- a machine readable .owl ontology file (the release file, ets.owl, compliant with semantic web standards accessible via an API (produced by and hosted on the GFBio Terminology Server: https://terminologies.gfbio.org/terminology/?ontology=ETS).
The rationale for developing the Ecological Trait-data standard has been cast in a paper that is available as pre-print:
Schneider, F.D., Jochum, M., Le Provost, G., Ostrowski, A., Penone, C., Fichtmüller, D., Gossner, M.M., Güntsch, A., König-Ries, B., Manning, P. and Simons, N.K. (2018) Towards an Ecological Trait-data Standard, biorxiv.org DOI: 10.1101/328302
The vocabulary builds on the Darwin Core Standard (DWC; Darwin Core Terms and extensions; these are referenced in field ‘Refines’; the full Darwin Core Standard can be found here: http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/index.htm). Note that the documentation page resolves deprecated terms to the term that replaces them in definition, unless they differ in definition. Via API access or in the OWL and CSV file, the definition is accessible for each deprecated term.
Core traitdata terms
For the essential primary data (trait value, taxon assignment, trait name), it is recommended to report the original naming and value scheme as used by the data provider. However, to ensure compatibility with other datasets, the original data provider’s information should be duplicated into standardized columns indexed by appending Std
to the column name. This ensures compatibility on the provider’s side and transparency for data users on the reported measurements and facts, and enables checking for inconsistencies and misspellings in the complete dataset provided by the author. If provided, the standardized fields allow merging heterogeneous data sources into a single table to perform further analyses. This practice of double bookkeeping of trait data has successfully established for the TRY database on plant traits, for instance (Kattge et al. 2011. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology, 17, 2905–2935).
By linking to (public) ontologies via the field taxonID
, further taxonomic information can be extracted for analysis. Alternatively, taxonID
may also link to an accompanying datasheet that contains information on the taxonomic resolution or specification of the observation.
Similarly, linking to published trait definitions in public thesauri or ontologies via the field traitID
allows an unambiguous interpretation of the trait measurement. If no online ontology is available, an accompanying data table should specify the trait definitions by making use of terms provided in the section ‘Traitlist’ below.
measurementID
go to top
Definition |
An identifier for the MeasurementOrFact (information pertaining to measurements, facts, characteristics, or assertions). May be a global unique identifier or an identifier specific to the data set. |
Comment |
Links multi-value trait measurements, e.g. x-y-z coordinates of a morphometric landmark, biochemical compound quantities for different chainlengths. In this case, the trait names must specify the sub-measurement, e.g. “landmark32_x”, and must be specified in a reference trait list, given in the field “measurementMethod”. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/measurementID |
DateIssued |
2018-11-01 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.9.1 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/measurementID |
Replaces |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/measurementid |
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
warnings
go to top
Definition |
Warnings on the quality or reliability of the reported trait value. |
Comment |
Warnings from autogenerated data should be stored here, e.g. regarding a lack of match between the provided taxonID and the ontology, or the trait names or values, a mismatch in the units provided and the unit expected according to the trait table. User defined warnings and flags can be added as well, e.g. ‘NOTUSE’ to mark data that are unreliable or erroneous. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/warnings |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2018-05-29 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
Terms for trait definitions
To cope with the variety of data types, trait-data should make use of globally valid and unambiguous trait definitions from public ontologies or thesauri, by providing their URIs in the field traitID
. Using this standardized terminology will facilitate merging trait definitions from multiple sources.
If no published trait definition is available that can be referenced, trait-datasets should be accompanied by a dataset-specific glossary of traits that would provide a definition specific to the study context. To be unambiguous, this list should be defining terms based on other well-defined terms from semantic ontologies, e.g. for units or higher hierarchical terms from trait ontologies (using broaderTerm
). Also refer to well-defined terms of other ontologies that describe standard units, morphological body parts, protein characteristics (Protein Ontology) or chemical terms (e.g. the ChEBI, http://www.obofoundry.org/ontology/chebi.html).
The following vocabulary helps to provide trait definitions as a separate data table or within the metadata object along with the publication of the trait dataset.
trait
go to top
Definition |
A descriptive trait name |
Comment |
Trait names should be unique but intuitively comprehensible. Additional specifications such as unit of measurement can be included in the name. Several words are separated by “_“. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/trait |
DateIssued |
2017-10-24 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
http://purl.org/dc/terms/title |
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
broaderTerm
go to top
Definition |
One or several terms that enclose the trait definition. |
Comment |
The broader term is given as the unique identifier (traitID) of the broader trait. Each trait can only have one broader term. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/broaderTerm |
DateIssued |
2017-08-24 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2017-11-15 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
narrowerTerm
go to top
Definition |
One or several terms that are enclosed by the trait definition. |
Comment |
This allows to derive hierarchical trees of traits. Several traits can be listed as narrower terms of one trait. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/narrowerTerm |
DateIssued |
2017-08-24 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2017-11-15 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
valueType
go to top
Definition |
Type of trait values. Possible entries are ‘numeric’, ‘integer’, ‘categorical’, ‘ordinal’, ‘logical’, or ‘character’. |
Comment |
Numerical values represent measurements of length, volumes, ratios, rates or timespans. Integer values apply to count data (e.g. eggs per clutch). Binary data (encoded as 0 or 1) or logical data (coded as TRUE or FALSE) may apply to qualitative traits such as specific behavior during mating (e.g. are territories defended) or specialization to a given habitat (e.g. species restricted to relicts of primeval forests). Categorical traits should define a constrained set of factor levels, such as sex differences in wing morphology (both sexes winged, both sexes unwinged, only males winged, only females winged) or unconstrained entries such as color. Ordinal categorical traits may be better encoded as integer values, e.g. a logical sequence as in the case of life stages or hibernation stages, or habitat preference traits such as horizontal stratum use. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/valueType |
DateIssued |
2017-09-27 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2017-11-15 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
expectedUnit
go to top
Definition |
The unit expected for measurement entries. |
Comment |
Only applies to numerical traits. Should be given in SI units. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/expectedUnit |
DateIssued |
2017-10-24 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2017-11-15 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
factorLevels
go to top
Definition |
A comma separated list of terms comprising the constrained vocabulary for categorical traits or ordinal binary traits. |
Comment |
Ordinal traits may be encoded with numerically indexed factor levels; e.g. 1_egg, 2_larvae, 3_pupae, 4_adult; the field traitDescription should define the factor levels; |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/factorLevels |
DateIssued |
2017-09-27 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2017-11-15 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
maxAllowedValue
go to top
Definition |
A lower boundary for accepted numerical values. |
Comment |
May be used for eliminating invalid data. This boundary may constrain a range of values of meaningful orders of magnitude, or constrain entries to positive values. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/maxAllowedValue |
DateIssued |
2017-09-27 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
minAllowedValue
go to top
Definition |
An upper boundary for accepted numerical values. |
Comment |
May be used for eliminating invalid data. This boundary may constrain a range of values of meaningful orders of magnitude. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/minAllowedValue |
DateIssued |
2017-09-27 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
traitDescription
go to top
Definition |
A short, unambiguous definition of the trait as used in the specific study context; may refer to a method of measurement; may copy the description of a public trait ontology; |
Comment |
The definition should make use of terms provided by existing public ontologies, e.g. ‘the mass (PATO:mass), either fresh or dried, of a fruit (PO:fruit)’ |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/traitDescription |
DateIssued |
2017-09-27 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2018-05-29 |
Refines |
http://purl.org/dc/terms/description |
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
source
go to top
Definition |
The original source of the trait definition |
Comment |
Can be a DOI or bibliographic reference to the original publication of this trait definition |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/source |
DateIssued |
2018-09-18 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.9 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
Extension: Taxon
This section provides terms to specify taxonomic resolution and hierarchical depth of the observed measurement or fact.
Especially when only providing a ‘scientificName’ an entry in kingdom
is recommended to identify homonyms. Additionally, class
, order
, phylum
, family
and genus
are variables to filter the dataset by. The entry taxonRank
should be specified to name the hierarchical level to which the observation applies, i.e. if data were measured on a verified instance of species “Agrotis exclamationis”, taxonRank
would be “species”. If the reported fact was generali
If the dataset provides a URI within taxonID
that maps to a taxonomic online reference or lookup table of an unambiguous and commonly accepted or verified species name, most of these information are redundant. They should be provided nonetheless to enable sorting and analysis by higher hierarchical levels.
taxonRank
go to top
Definition |
The taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName. Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary. |
Comment |
This is to clarify cases where information is not given on a species level. Examples: “subspecies”, “varietas”, “forma”, “species”, “genus”. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:taxonRank |
valueType |
factor |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonRank |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2018-03-21 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
Extension: Measurement or Fact
This section provides additional information about a reported measurement or fact and in most cases can easily be included as extra columns to the core dataset.
As a high-level discrimination of the source of the measurement or fact, the Darwin Core Term basisOfRecord
takes an entry about the type of trait data recorded: Were they taken by own measurement (distinguish “LivingSpecimen”, “PreservedSpecimen”, “FossilSpecimen”) or taken from literature (“literatureData”), from an existing trait database (“traitDatabase”), or is it expert knowledge (“expertKnowledge”). It is highly recommended to provide further detail about the source in the column basisOfRecordDescription
.
To keep track of potential sources of noise or bias in measured data, the method of measurement (measurementMethod
), the person conducting the measurement (measurementDeterminedBy
), and the date at which the measurement was obtained (measurementDeterminedDate
) are recorded. Authors would often report aggregate data of repeated or pooled measurements, e.g. by weighing multiple individuals simultaneously and calculating an average. In these cases, recording the number of individuals (individualCount
) along with a dispersion measure (e.g. variance or standard deviation, dispersion
) or range of values (e.g. min and max of values observed in the field measurementValueMin
, measurementValueMax
) is adviced. The field statisticalMethod
names the method for data aggregation (e.g. mean or median) as well as the variation or range (e.g. reporting variance or standard deviation).
For data not obtained from own measurement, the field references
provides a precise reference to the source of data (e.g. a book or existing database) or the authority of expert knowledge. For literature data, the original source might report trait values on the family or genus level, but the dataset author infers and reports the trait data at species level (e.g. if the entire genus reportedly shares the same trait value). To preserve this information, the column measurementResolution
should report the taxon rank for which the reported value was originally assessed.
measurementResolution
go to top
Definition |
If the trait information was originally given on another taxonomic level than species. Applies mainly for literature and expert knowledge data. not applying for measured data. The hierarchical level to which the trait data would refer. |
Comment |
For example, information given in literature could state ‘most species in this genus are winged’, but the trait data could be given for each species in this genus. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/measurementResolution |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
measurementMethod
go to top
Definition |
Applies primarily to measured data. The method, tools and scales used to measure a (numerical) trait value. A description of or reference to (publication, URI) the method or protocol used to determine the measurement, fact, characteristic, or assertion. |
Comment |
Should be a concise and standardized text entry or reference (publication, URI), referring to a particular method (e.g. ‘direct weighing’, ‘length-mass regression’, ‘intertegular span’, ‘length between node X and y’ ) and measurement conditions (e.g. certain temperature or humidity, name of device or scale used for measurement). To avoid repetition or lengthy entries, authors should use global identifiers of methodological terms if available, or enter dataset specific identifiers and provide a more detailed description of the method or protocol used to determine the measurement, fact, characteristic, or assertion in the metadata of the dataset. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/measurementMethod |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/measurementMethod |
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
measurementDeterminedBy
go to top
Definition |
A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups, or organizations who determined the value of the measurement. |
Comment |
The recommended best practice is to separate the values with a vertical bar (‘|’). Examples: “Rob Guralnick”, “Julie Woodruff | Eileen Lacey”. Can be encoded by dataset-specific identifiers for reasons of privacy. This is kept as a co-factor for repeated measurements. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/measurementDeterminedBy |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
measurementDeterminedDate
go to top
Definition |
The date on which the MeasurementOrFact was made. Recommended best practice is to use an encoding scheme, such as ISO 8601:2004(E). |
Comment |
Examples: “1963-03-08T14:07-0600” is 8 Mar 1963 2:07pm in the time zone six hours earlier than UTC, “2009-02-20T08:40Z” is 20 Feb 2009 8:40am UTC, “1809-02-12” is 12 Feb 1809, “1906-06” is Jun 1906, “1971” is just that year, “2007-03-01T13:00:00Z/2008-05-11T15:30:00Z” is the interval between 1 Mar 2007 1pm UTC and 11 May 2008 3:30pm UTC, “2007-11-13/15” is the interval between 13 Nov 2007 and 15 Nov 2007. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:measurementDeterminedDate |
valueType |
Date |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/measurementDeterminedDate |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
aggregateMeasure
go to top
Definition |
Is measurementValue reporting an individual measurement or an aggregate Measure? Takes a binary entry: TRUE or FALSE |
Comment |
This is flagging aggregate data in an unambiguous way. Aggregate measures are often reported for repeated measures, e.g. replicate measurements of leaf size from a single plant individual or for grouped measurement, e.g. for weightings of a counted number of specimens (e.g. leaves or small organisms). |
valueType |
logical |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/aggregateMeasure |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
dispersion
go to top
Definition |
If aggregate measure of multiple individuals or specimens, the numeric value of dispersion (variance or standard deviation) for the mean value reported in measurementValue_user (no unit conversion is provided by the R-package!). Defaults to 0. If a value is provided, report the statistical method in the field statisticalMethod. |
Comment |
|
valueType |
numeric |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/dispersion |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
statisticalMethod
go to top
Definition |
For aggregated measures, the method for data aggregation or averaging as well as the variation or range. |
Comment |
Example: ‘mean and standard deviation’, ‘median and 95% confidence interval’, ‘mean and variance’, ‘mean and range of values’, ‘median and 95% interquantile range’ |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/statisticalMethod |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
Extension: Occurrence
This category of terms contains further information about the individual specimen or occurrence that has been observed and measured. Especially for analyses of intra-specific trait variation, this composes valuable data. It also helps tracking the methodology and primary source of the data and keep the reference to the actual specimen (e.g. for museum collections or related data analysis).
For both literature and measured data, trait values may be recorded for different sub-categories of individuals of a taxon to capture polymorphisms, for instance differentiated by sex or life stage. The template provides the fields sex
, lifeStage
, age
, and morphotype
for this distinction.
Sampling may be further specified using a unique identifier for the sampling event (eventID
) which references to an external dataset. The record of a samplingProtocol
may capture bias in samling methods. Further procedures and methods of preservation should be reported in preparations
.
Seasonal variation of traits may be recorded by assigning a date and time of sampling to the occurrence, using the fields year
, month
and day
, depending on resolution. Further field definitions of the Darwin Core Standard can be applied instead, to refer to a geological stratum, for instance.
To capture geographic variation of traits, a set of fields for georeferencing can put the observation into spatial and ecological context (habitat
, decimalLongitude
, decimalLatitude
, elevation
, geodeticDatum
, verbatimLocality
, country
, countryCode
). The field locationID
may be used to reference the occurrence to a dataset-specific or global identifier. This allows the trait data to double as observation data, e.g. for upload to the GBIF database.
For most trait data compiled from literature or expert knowledge, the level of information on an ‘occurrence’ would not apply, since no specific individual has been observed. In this case, the field ‘occurrenceID’ should be left blank in the core data. In cases where different aggregate ranges or averages are reported for male and female individuals, the columns sex or developmental stage may be used without the reference to an occurrence ID.
sex
go to top
Definition |
The sex of the biological individual(s) represented in the Occurrence. Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary. |
Comment |
Use vocabulary: “male”, “female”, “subadult”, “unknown”, “hermaphrodite” (no abbreviations or numerical encodings) |
valueType |
factor |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/sex |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/sex |
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
lifeStage
go to top
Definition |
The age class or life stage of the biological individual(s) at the time the Occurrence was recorded. Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary. |
Comment |
Recommended factor levels are: seed, seedling, sapling, adult, egg, larval_instar_1, larval_instar_2, larval_instar_3, … , pupa; For very taxon-specific life stages, it is recommended to provide detailed explanation in the metadata of the dataset. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/lifeStage |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/lifeStage |
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
age
go to top
Definition |
The age of the specimen in years. |
Comment |
Use integer or float numbers. Example: “2”, “0.16”. |
valueType |
numeric |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/age |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
morphotype
go to top
Definition |
The morphotype of the observed specimen. |
Comment |
Examples: “worker”, “drone”, “queen”. Since morphotypes can differ between organism groups, provide definition of morphotypes in the metadata of the dataset. |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/morphotype |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
eventID
go to top
Definition |
The sampling event or campaign. A globally valid URI or user specified character string that links to another table providing detailed information, e.g. environmental or temporal parameters, descriptions on methods etc.. |
Comment |
Examples: a combination of date and sampling region |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/eventID |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/eventID |
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
preparations
go to top
Definition |
For preserved specimens, a list (concatenated and separated) of preparations and preservation methods for the occurrence. |
Comment |
Do not report procedures for measurement or sampling here (see samplingProtocol and measurementMethod). The recommended best practice is to separate the values with a vertical bar (‘|’). Examples: “fossil”, “cast”, “photograph”, “DNA extract”, “skin |”skull | skeleton“,”whole animal (ETOH) | tissue (EDTA)“. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:preparations |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/preparations |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
samplingProtocol
go to top
Definition |
The name of, reference to, or description of the method or protocol used for obtaining the specimen. |
Comment |
Examples: “UV light trap”, “mist net”, “bottom trawl”, “ad hoc observation”, “point count”, “Penguins from space: faecal stains reveal the location of emperor penguin colonies, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00467.x”, “Takats et al. 2001. Guidelines for Nocturnal Owl Monitoring in North America. Beaverhill Bird Observatory and Bird Studies Canada, Edmonton, Alberta. 32 pp.”, “http://www.bsc-eoc.org/download/Owl.pdf”. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:samplingProtocol |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/samplingProtocol |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
eventDate
go to top
Definition |
The date-time or interval during which an Event occurred. For occurrences, this is the date-time when the event was recorded. Not suitable for a time in a geological context. Recommended best practice is to use an encoding scheme, such as ISO 8601:2004(E). For lower precision, use year, month and day field instead. |
Comment |
Note: this is not to record the date when the specimens were measured (use measurementDeterminedDate for this). If applicable, at least provide a year. Providing a date is highly viable for studies analyzing temporal variation in traits. Examples: “1963-03-08T14:07-0600” is 8 Mar 1963 2:07pm in the time zone six hours earlier than UTC, “2009-02-20T08:40Z” is 20 Feb 2009 8:40am UTC, “1809-02-12” is 12 Feb 1809, “1906-06” is Jun 1906, “1971” is just that year, “2007-03-01T13:00:00Z/2008-05-11T15:30:00Z” is the interval between 1 Mar 2007 1pm UTC and 11 May 2008 3:30pm UTC, “2007-11-13/15” is the interval between 13 Nov 2007 and 15 Nov 2007. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:eventDate |
valueType |
Date |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/eventDate |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/eventDate |
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
locationID
go to top
Definition |
An identifier for the set of location information (data associated with dcterms:Location). May be a global unique identifier or an identifier specific to the data set. |
Comment |
Could report the plot within the experimental setting which would be further specified in the metadata or in a separate dataset. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:locationID |
valueType |
factor |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/locationID |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
decimalLongitude
go to top
Definition |
The geographic longitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic center of a Location. Positive values are east of the Greenwich Meridian, negative values are west of it. Legal values lie between -180 and 180, inclusive. |
Comment |
Example: “-121.1761111”. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:decimalLongitude |
valueType |
numeric |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/decimalLongitude |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
decimalLatitude
go to top
Definition |
The geographic latitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic center of a Location. Positive values are north of the Equator, negative values are south of it. Legal values lie between -90 and 90, inclusive. |
Comment |
Example: “-41.0983423”. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:decimalLatitude |
valueType |
numeric |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/decimalLatitude |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
geodeticDatum
go to top
Definition |
The ellipsoid, geodetic datum, or spatial reference system (SRS) upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude as based. Recommended best practice is use the EPSG code as a controlled vocabulary to provide an SRS, if known. Otherwise use a controlled vocabulary for the name or code of the geodetic datum, if known. Otherwise use a controlled vocabulary for the name or code of the ellipsoid, if known. If none of these is known, use the value “unknown”. |
Comment |
Examples: “EPSG:4326”, “WGS84”, “NAD27”, “Campo Inchauspe”, “European 1950”, “Clarke 1866”. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:geodeticDatum |
valueType |
factor |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/geodeticDatum |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
verbatimLocality
go to top
Definition |
The specific description of the place. |
Comment |
Less specific geographic information can be provided in other geographic terms of Darwin Core (higherGeography, continent, country, stateProvince, county, municipality, waterBody, island, islandGroup). This term may contain information modified from the original to correct perceived errors or standardize the description. Example: “25 km NNE Bariloche por R. Nac. 237”. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:verbatimLocality |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/verbatimLocality |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
country
go to top
Definition |
The name of the country or major administrative unit in which the Location occurs. Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary such as the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names. |
Comment |
Examples: “Germany”, “Denmark”, “Colombia”, “España”. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:country; |
valueType |
character |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/country |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
countryCode
go to top
Definition |
The standard code for the country in which the Location occurs. Recommended best practice is to use ISO 3166-1-alpha-2 country codes. |
Comment |
Examples:“DE” for Germany, “AR” for Argentina, “SV” for El Salvador. For discussion see http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/dwc:countryCode |
valueType |
factor |
Identifier |
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/countryCode |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
Extension: Biodiversity Exploratories
This section records location in the context of the Biodiversity Exploratories project (www.biodiversity-exploratories.de). The field OriginExploratories
flags trait measurements originating from samples in the project context. Exploratory
and ExploType
allow to place the sample within a region or a landscape type (Grassland or Forest). From ExploratotriesPlotID
a detailled georeference can be inferred. Additional spatial resolution, e.g. on subplots, may be provided in locationID
of the Occurence extension.
Trait data uploaded to the Biodiversity Exploratories Information System (BExIS) should use the vocabulary in a single-file longtable format (no DwC-Archives supported).
OriginBE
go to top
Definition |
Did measured specimens originate from Exploratories Plots? TRUE or FALSE, defaults to FALSE |
Comment |
As unambiguous flag for data and specimens that are originating from Exploratories sites. |
valueType |
logical |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/OriginBE |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
|
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
BEPlotID
go to top
Definition |
EP plot ID (or also any valid Gridplot ID or MIP ID) where the measured specimen was extracted. |
Comment |
Only for specimen that were extracted from the Exploratories directly (or direct offspring, if hatched in the lab). Please also report it, even if this was not part of your research question and provide a Date (a year at last) if available. |
valueType |
factor |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/BEPlotID |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2018-03-21 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
Exploratory
go to top
Definition |
Exploratories Region (Hainich, Schorfheide, Alb) for sorting purpose and readability, or if exact Plot ID is not available. |
Comment |
Use vocabulary: ‘HAI’; ‘SCH’; ‘ALB’ |
valueType |
factor |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/Exploratory |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2017-11-01 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
BEType
go to top
Definition |
Defined code for landscape type of the exploratories plot. |
Comment |
Use vocabulary: “W” for forest and “G” for grassland plot |
valueType |
factor |
Identifier |
http://terminologies.gfbio.org/terms/ETS/BEType |
DateIssued |
2017-07-07 |
FirstIssuedIn |
v0.8 |
DateModified |
2018-05-29 |
Refines |
|
Replaces |
|
Deprecated |
NA |
ReplacedBy |
|
comments
go to top